Key result
US patients show ~123% higher odds of antiplatelet adherence but lower statin adherence than Hong Kong Chinese.
Why the study?
Differences in medication use patterns of lipid-lowering drugs and antiplatelet agents among post-PCI ACS patients aged <65 between Hong Kong and the USA were unknown.
Are there differences in medication adherence and persistence to statins and antiplatelet agents among post-PCI ACS patients in Hong Kong compared to the USA?
Observational (n=1,283)
Yes
Are there differences in medication adherence and persistence to statins and antiplatelet agents among post-PCI ACS patients in Hong Kong compared to the USA?
Odds Ratio: 2.23 (95% CI 1.6–3.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 84.6% vs 67.41%
p-value: p=<0.001
Post-PCI ACS patients in Hong Kong demonstrated better adherence to statins but worse adherence to antiplatelet agents compared to privately insured patients in the USA, alongside regional differences in prescribed drug potencies.
Regional adherence differences should not yet change practice; leaves open healthcare system influences on post-PCI statin versus antiplatelet persistence.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to explore the differences in medication use pattern of lipid-lowering drug (LLD) and antiplatelet agents among post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients with acute coronary syndrome aged <65 in Hong Kong (HK) and the USA. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: This study used deidentified claims data from Clinformatics Data Mart database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA) and electronic health records from HK Hospital Authority Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System database. PARTICIPANTS: We used 1 year prescription records of LLDs and antiplatelet agents among 1013 USA patients and 270 HK Chinese patients in 2011-2013. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Continuity was investigated on the assumption that one defined daily dose represented 1 day treatment. Medication possession ratio method was used to evaluate the adherence. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regressions were constructed to compare the good continuity and adherence levels in the merged database with the cutoffs set at 80%, and Cox proportional hazard models were built using the time to discontinuation as the dependent variable, to assess the persistence level. RESULTS: HK Chinese patients were less adherent (67.41% vs 84.60%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for Americans over Chinese=2.23 (95% CI=1.60 to 3.12), p<0.001) to antiplatelet agents compared with American patients but better adherent to statins (90.00% vs 78.18%, AOR=0.37 (0.23 to 0.58), p<0.001). The discontinuation with statins was more common in American patients (13.33% vs 34.25%, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)=2.95 (2.05 to 4.24), p<0.001). Low-to-moderate potency statins and clopidogrel were favoured by our HK local physicians, while American patients received higher doses of statins and prasugrel. CONCLUSIONS: We seemed to find HK physicians tended to prescribe cheaper and lower doses of statins and antiplatelet agents when compared with the privately insured patients in the USA, though the adherence and persistence levels of HK patients with statins were relatively good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome post-percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1,283). American healthcare setting/patients vs. Hong Kong Chinese healthcare setting/patients was evaluated on Adherence to antiplatelet agents (medication possession ratio ≥80%) (AOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.60-3.12, p=<0.001). American patients had higher adherence to antiplatelet agents (84.60% vs 67.41%; AOR 2.23) but lower adherence to statins (78.18% vs 90.00%; AOR 0.37) compared to Hong Kong Chinese patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: