Key result
Smart 12-lead ECG T-shirt matches Holter monitors for cardiac rhythm assessment during walking and rest.
Why the study?
Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically limited by few surface leads, autonomy, and recording length, whereas smart garments with conductive textile electrodes offer promise for continuous monitoring.
Does a smart 12-lead ECG acquisition T-shirt provide comparable ECG signal quality to a standard 12-lead Holter recording in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Does a smart 12-lead ECG acquisition T-shirt provide comparable ECG signal quality to a standard 12-lead Holter recording in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 46.7% vs 53.3%
p-value: p=.60
A smart 12-lead ECG T-shirt provides short-duration ECG signal quality comparable to a standard Holter monitor in healthy subjects.
May support short-term wearable ECG monitoring in healthy subjects; leaves open validation in patients with arrhythmias.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS: We evaluated the ECG signal quality measured on healthy subjects with a smart 12-lead ECG acquisition T-shirt or a 12-lead Holter recording. ECG signals were recorded during 3 min with both techniques in three resting positions (supine, seated, standing) and while walking. Three readers independently assessed ECG patterns and evaluated the denoising of the isoelectric line, the distinction of p waves, R peaks and RR intervals, and the possible appreciation of cardiac rhythm in at least 3 leads. RESULTS: Thirty healthy subjects (70% males, 29.5 ± 7.8 years) were enrolled in the study. For all three resting conditions, cardiac rhythm was appreciated in 100% of recordings with distinction of p waves, R peaks, and isoelectric line in >97% of recordings. Appreciation of cardiac rhythm was lower in the walking conditions with both techniques (53.3% vs. 46.7%, Holter vs. smart T-shirt, p = .60) mainly due to difficulties to distinguish p waves. These results were consistent across both genders. All ECG parameters (heart rate, PR, QRS and QTC intervals) were comparable between both techniques. No skin irritation was seen with the textile electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: A smart T-shirt with 13 textiles electrodes allows short-duration 12-lead ECG acquisition with quality levels comparable to Holter recordings. The novel device should now be evaluated for long-term non-invasive ECG monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fouassier et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=30). Smart 12-lead ECG acquisition T-shirt vs. 12-lead Holter recording was evaluated on Appreciation of cardiac rhythm in walking conditions (p=.60). A smart 12-lead ECG T-shirt provided comparable appreciation of cardiac rhythm to a Holter monitor during walking (46.7% vs 53.3%, p=0.60) and 100% during resting conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: