Key result
Lower plasma A2AR inhibition identifies significant CAD with an AUC of 0.87.
Why the study?
Evaluating suspected chronic coronary syndrome is challenging due to noninvasive tests having high false positive and negative rates, and no biomarker exists to assess myocardial ischemia when troponin and electrocardiography are negative.
Does plasma A2AR measurement using inhibition ELISA accurately identify patients with significant coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=54)
Does plasma A2AR measurement using inhibition ELISA accurately identify patients with significant coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 68% vs 83%
p-value: p=< 0.001
A novel rapid ELISA for soluble A2AR in plasma shows high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.87) for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
May support noninvasive CAD detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
The evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) in the medical community is challenging. Patients with suspected coronary chronic syndrome (CCS) are referred by the medical community to be assessed by specialists for the performance of noninvasive tests that have high rates of false positives and false negatives. While troponins are the gold standard for evaluate myocardial injuries, there is no biomarker to assess myocardial ischemia in patient populations with negative electrocardiography or without an increase in troponin level. A2A adenosine receptors control the coronary blood flow through its vasodilating properties. It has been shown that patients with CAD have a lower A2AR expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting a link between A2AR production and the severity of CAD. Herein, we present a new and innovative method of inhibition ELISA for A2AR in the plasma of patients who permit the evaluation of the amount of soluble A2AR. For this analysis, the total study sample was 54, including 31 patients with CAD with stenosis > 50% and a significant fractional flow reserve (FFR < 0.8) (Group 1) and 23 patients with normal or non-obstructive coronary arteries (stenosis < 50% and nonsignificant FFR > 0.8) (Group 2). The % inhibition (which is linked to the presence of soluble receptors) with the plasma of patients with FFR < 0.8 was significantly lower than that of patients with FFR > 0.8 (median [range]: 68% [20.7−86.9] vs. 83% [67−88.4]; p < 0.001). The ROC curve indicated a good sensitivity/specificity ratio with a cut off of 72.5% and an area under the curve of 0.87. In conclusion, a rapid ELISA to assess soluble A2AR in the plasma shows promise to screen patients suspected of having CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paganelli et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=54). Plasma A2AR measurement via inhibition ELISA vs. Patients with normal or non-obstructive coronary arteries (FFR > 0.8) was evaluated on Percentage of inhibition of A2AR in plasma (p=< 0.001). Plasma A2AR measurement showed significantly lower % inhibition in patients with significant CAD (FFR < 0.8) compared to those without (median 68% vs 83%; p < 0.001), with an AUC of 0.87.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: