Key result
Visual WMSI strongly outperforms longitudinal peak strain for detecting STEMI scar transmurality.
Why the study?
Does longitudinal peak strain predict final infarct size and transmurality better than visual assessment of wall motion in patients with acute STEMI?
Observational (n=26)
Observers blinded to temporal order and transmurality results
Does longitudinal peak strain predict final infarct size and transmurality better than visual assessment of wall motion in patients with acute STEMI?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.78% vs 0.92%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Visual assessment of wall motion score index is superior to longitudinal peak strain for predicting final infarct transmurality in patients with acute STEMI.
Supports visual WMSI over strain for transmural scar detection in acute STEMI; leaves open prospective validation of incremental utility.
BACKGROUND: Opening of an occluded infarct related artery reduces infarct size and improves survival in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this study we performed tissue Doppler analysis (peak strain, displacement, mitral annular movement (MAM)) and compared with visual assessment for the study of the correlation of measurements of global, regional and segmental function with final infarct size and transmurality. In addition, myocardial risk area was determined and a prediction sought for the development of infarct transmurality >or=50%. METHODS: Twenty six patients with STEMI submitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were examined with echocardiography on the catheterization table. Four to eight weeks later repeat echocardiography was performed for reassessment of function and magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of final infarct size and transmurality. RESULTS: On a global level, wall motion score index (WMSI), ejection fraction (EF), strain, and displacement all showed significant differences (p or=50%, but strain added no significant information to that obtained with WMSI in a logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute STEMI, WMSI, EF, strain, and displacement showed significant changes between the pre- and post PCI exam. In a ROC-analysis, strain had 64% sensitivity at 80% specificity and WMSI around 90% sensitivity at 80% specificity for the detection of scar with transmurality >or=50% at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosendahl et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=26). Longitudinal peak strain (tissue Doppler) vs. Visual assessment of wall motion score index (WMSI) was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of scar transmurality ≥50% at follow-up (p=<0.0001). In patients with acute STEMI, visual assessment of wall motion score index was superior to longitudinal peak strain for detecting scar transmurality ≥50% at follow-up (AUC 0.92 vs 0.78, p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: