Key result
Prone chiropractic manipulation increases LF/HF ratio ~40% versus supine, indicating greater immediate autonomic effects.
Why the study?
Thoracic manipulation is frequently used via several preferred methods, but the immediate effects of supine versus prone techniques on the autonomic nervous system had not been compared.
Does prone thoracic high-velocity-low-amplitude chiropractic manipulation improve autonomic nervous system parameters compared to supine manipulation in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=62)
Simple randomization
No
Does prone thoracic high-velocity-low-amplitude chiropractic manipulation improve autonomic nervous system parameters compared to supine manipulation in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.86% vs 2.05%
p-value: p=0.008
Prone mid-thoracic chiropractic HVLA manipulation has a greater immediate effect on the autonomic nervous system, specifically increasing the LF/HF ratio, compared to supine manipulation in healthy individuals.
Immediate autonomic effects of supine versus prone thoracic manipulation remain preliminary in healthy adults; larger trials needed before clinical consideration.
Thoracic manipulation is one of the spinal manipulative treatment methods frequently used by clinicians. However, when carrying out this task, several methods could be preferred. This study aimed to compare the immediate effects of supine and prone thoracic high-velocity-low-amplitude chiropractic manipulations on the autonomic nervous system. The study included 62 healthy and volunteer participants aged 18-45 years. Participants were randomly assigned to supine and prone manipulation groups. Both groups, heart rate variability data were obtained with the Elite HRV CorSense device for 1 minute before the application, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured, pulse and saturation values were recorded. After the measurement, supine chiropractic manipulation was applied to the mid-thoracic region and the same measurements were repeated. Heart rate variability data were analyzed with Elite HRV application, pulse rate, saturation, systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were recorded, and the results were statistically evaluated. In the intra-group comparison, LF/HF ratio increased in the prone group (p=0.025). When the difference between the groups was analyzed, the change in LF/HF ratio was found to be statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.008). The effect of prone application on the autonomic nervous system was found to be higher than supine application. This study revealed that prone and supine thoracic chiropractic HVLA application was effective on OSS in healthy individuals and that the efficiency of prone manipulation was significantly higher.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aygün et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=62). Prone thoracic high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation vs. Supine thoracic high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation was evaluated on LF/HF ratio (p=0.008). Prone mid-thoracic chiropractic manipulation significantly increased the LF/HF ratio compared to supine manipulation (p=0.008), indicating a greater immediate effect on the autonomic nervous system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: