Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized open-label trial of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected persons compared safety and efficacy for 38 patients receiving hydroxyurea/didanosine combination therapy with findings in 42 persons given didanosine monotherapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of hydroxyurea/didanosine combination therapy for all patients. Week 12 on-treatment group comparisons showed a mean decrease in virus load between hydroxyurea/didanosine versus didanosine groups of -0.93 versus -0.74 log10 copies/mL (P=.20); a higher percentage of the hydroxyurea/didanosine group below the assay's detection limit (500 copies/mL), 29% versus 7% (P=.017); and median change in CD4 cells for the hydroxyurea/didanosine versus didanosine group of 0 versus 43 cells/mm3 (P=.045), although median change in CD4 percentage was similar (0.9% vs. 1.2%, P=.64). Week 24 virus load reductions and CD4 cell changes were similar in both groups. Intent-to-treat and on-treatment analyses showed similar results. The hydroxyurea/didanosine combination was well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hellinger et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: