Key result
Interval training, especially high-intensity interval training, consistently improves VO2max and cardiovascular fitness across diverse populations, outperforming moderate-intensity continuous training.
Why the study?
The rise in cardiovascular diseases has necessitated implementing effective interventions to improve cardiorespiratory endurance.
Does interval training (IT), particularly high-intensity interval training (HIIT), improve cardiorespiratory endurance compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in diverse populations?
Systematic Review
Does interval training (IT), particularly high-intensity interval training (HIIT), improve cardiorespiratory endurance compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in diverse populations?
Interval training, particularly HIIT, is an effective and time-efficient method for improving cardiorespiratory endurance across diverse populations, outperforming moderate-intensity continuous training.
HIIT provides a time-efficient option to improve cardiorespiratory endurance across populations; confirms superiority to MICT and supports guideline updates.
Background. The rise in cardiovascular diseases has necessitated implementing effective interventions to improve cardiorespiratory endurance. Objectives. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interval training (IT), particulary high-intensity interval training (HIIT), in enhancing cardiorespiratory endurance across various demographics. IT, characterized by high-intensity exercise followed by recovery periods, has gained attention for its potential to improve key cardiovascular markers such as VO₂max and cardiovascular efficiency. Materials and methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. From 893 initially screened articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies examined the effects of IT, especially HIIT, on cardiorespiratory endurance across various population groups, including sedentary individuals, athletes, and older adults. Metrics such as VO₂max and cardiovascular efficiency were the primary outcomes measured. Results. The findings indicate that IT, especially HIIT, consistently improves VO₂max and overall cardiovascular fitness in diverse populations. HIIT has been observed to outperform moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in generating faster cardiovascular adaptations. Despite its benefits, the high intensity of IT requires careful individualization to mitigate the risk of injury, particularly in populations with lower baseline fitness levels. Conclusions. This review concludes that IT is an effective and time-efficient method for improving cardiorespiratory endurance. It should be considered a viable option in both clinical and athletic populations. However, further research is recommended to investigate the long-term safety of HIIT in high-risk populations and to enhance adherence to these exercise protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ridwan et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Cardiorespiratory endurance. Interval training (High-Intensity Interval Training) vs. Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or control was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory endurance (VO2max and cardiovascular efficiency). Interval training, especially high-intensity interval training, consistently improves VO2max and cardiovascular fitness across diverse populations, outperforming moderate-intensity continuous training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: