Key result
Survey of interventional cardiologists finds significant variation in structural heart procedure volumes and proficiency requirements.
Cross-Sectional (n=117)
The survey highlights the rapid growth of structural heart interventions and the urgent need for standardized training and credentialing approaches.
Variation in structural heart training signals inconsistent competency standards; leaves open validated procedural thresholds for credentialing.
BACKGROUND: Minimal information is available on the number and type of procedures being performed for structural and valvular heart disease, the physicians who perform these procedures, and on the training requirements for this emerging field. METHODS: Surveys were performed using an online survey of members of the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), including its Council on Structural Heart Disease and the Congenital Heart Disease Committee. The responses of 107 US-based interventional cardiologists were analyzed. A second questionnaire of a purposive sample of 10 training directors of US interventional cardiology programs was also performed. RESULTS: Although many procedures (e.g., transseptal puncture, PFO, and ASD closure) are commonly performed by most respondents, others are limited to a significant minority of respondents (e.g., alcohol septal ablation, transcatheter valve repair, and implantation). In addition, the number of procedures performed varies greatly as does the training directors' estimate of the number necessary to gain proficiency. There is no single method being used to gain the requisite skills. A number of factors that limit the more widespread growth of this field were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The field of intervention for structural and valvular heart disease is new, growing rapidly, and will require a core knowledge base and new didactic methods. The cardiovascular community will be challenged to devise new training standards and credentialing approaches to serve interventionalists interested in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrmann et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Structural and valvular heart disease (n=117). Survey on procedures and training requirements was evaluated on Number and type of procedures performed, training requirements, and proficiency estimates. A survey of 117 interventional cardiologists and training directors revealed significant variation in the number of structural heart procedures performed and the estimated training required for proficiency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: