Key result
Metabolic syndrome linked to ~92% higher odds of obstructive CAD in women with chest pain.
Why the study?
The sex-related impact of metabolic syndrome on obstructive coronary artery disease has not been well evaluated.
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome differentially associate with obstructive coronary artery disease in women versus men?
Observational (n=1,156)
Yes
Does the presence of metabolic syndrome differentially associate with obstructive coronary artery disease in women versus men?
Odds Ratio: 1.92 (95% CI 1.31–2.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 47.3% vs 24.5%
p-value: p=0.001
Metabolic syndrome is a stronger independent predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease in women than in men presenting with chest pain.
Metabolic syndrome may aid risk stratification in women with chest pain; leaves open differential association versus men and prospective validation.
Background: The sex-related impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) has not been well evaluated. Methods: A total of 1156 patients (62 years and 58% women) with chest pain undergoing invasive coronary angiography (CAG) were recruited from the database of the nation-wide chest pain registry. MetS was defined according to the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation. OCAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis of the left main coronary artery and/or ≥70% stenosis of any other coronary arteries. Results: Women were older than men (65 vs. 59 years, p < 0.001). OCAD (32.0% vs. 30.9%) and MetS (27.8% vs. 27.9%) prevalence rates were similar in both sexes (p > 0.05). The presence of MetS was associated with higher prevalence of OCAD in women (24.5% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.001), but not in men (31.0% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.487). The linear association between the number of components meeting MetS criteria and OCAD prevalence was significant in both sexes (p < 0.001 for each), but it was stronger in women than in men (Chi-square value: 81.9 vs. 14.8, p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, the presence of MetS was independently associated with OCAD in women even after controlling for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–2.81; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with chest pain undergoing invasive CAG, the association between the number of components meeting MetS criteria and OCAD prevalence was stronger in women than in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Chest pain (n=1,156). Metabolic syndrome vs. Absence of metabolic syndrome was evaluated on Obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.31-2.81, p=0.001). In women with chest pain undergoing invasive coronary angiography, metabolic syndrome was independently associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.31-2.81; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: