Key result
Optimal cardiovascular health scores were associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared with inadequate scores in both men and women.
Why the study?
The association between cardiovascular health metrics and the risk of heart failure in a Finnish population was not established.
Do optimal cardiovascular health metrics reduce the risk of incident heart failure in an aging population?
Cohort (n=3,210)
Do optimal cardiovascular health metrics reduce the risk of incident heart failure in an aging population?
Maintaining optimal cardiovascular health metrics is associated with a substantially lower long-term risk of developing heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimal CVH metrics were associated with lower HF risk; supports prevention emphasis but leaves causal effects open for trials.
AIMS: This study aimed to examine the association between cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics and the risk of heart failure (HF) in a Finnish population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the prospective population-based Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease cohort study comprising men aged 42-60 years at baseline (1984-89) and women aged 53-73 years at baseline (1998-2001). The CVH scores were computed from American Heart Association's CVH metrics for 2385 men and 825 women without a history of HF at baseline. The CVH scores, ranging from 0 to 14, were categorized into three: inadequate, average, and optimal groups. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HF. During a median follow-up period of 27 years for men, and 18 years for women, 465 and 124 HF events were recorded, respectively. The mean ages for men and women were 53 and 63 years, respectively. One hundred and thirty-three men (5.6%) and 73 women (8.8%) had five or more ideal CVH metrics. Participants with optimal CVH scores had a 64% and 48% lower risk of HF when compared with those with inadequate CVH scores among men and women, respectively (HR, 95% CI: men = 0.36, 0.26-0.49, P < 0.01; women = 0.52, 0.31-0.89, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal CVH metrics is associated with a lower risk of HF among an ageing Finnish population. Optimal CVH score should be targeted among the general population to reduce the risk of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isiozor et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=3,210). Optimal cardiovascular health (CVH) scores vs. Inadequate CVH scores was evaluated on Heart failure (HR 0.36 (men), HR 0.52 (women), 95% CI 0.26-0.49 (men), 0.31-0.89 (women), p=<0.01 (men), 0.02 (women)). Optimal cardiovascular health scores were associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared with inadequate scores in both men and women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: