Key result
Random urine protein-creatinine ratios yield highly inaccurate 24-hour proteinuria estimates due to circadian rhythm.
Why the study?
Does the protein:creatinine ratio of 3-h urine samples accurately estimate 24-h proteinuria in patients with glomerular disease?
Observational (n=30)
Does the protein:creatinine ratio of 3-h urine samples accurately estimate 24-h proteinuria in patients with glomerular disease?
Due to the circadian rhythm of proteinuria, random urine protein:creatinine ratios have limited accuracy for estimating 24-h proteinuria, but fixed-time samples (e.g., 06.00-09.00) are an acceptable alternative.
Random urine protein:creatinine ratios vary widely from true 24-h values; supports caution in practice and leaves open validation of timed collections in glomerular disease.
Proteinuria in patients with glomerular disease has a circadian rhythm, but for creatinine such a rhythm is either absent or of low amplitude. We found in 18 of 23 admitted patients (group I) and in seven outpatients (group II) a marked circadian rhythm of the protein: creatinine ratio. Estimates of 24-h proteinuria were obtained by multiplying the protein:creatinine ratio of 3-h urine samples with 24-h creatinine excretion, calculated from age, sex and bodyweight. Estimated proteinuria could be as low as 19% or as high as 349% of actually measured 24-h proteinuria; the mean SD was 23%. The best estimate was obtained with the 06.00–09.00 hours urine samples. The estimates correlated better with actually measured 24-h proteinuria than the protein: creatinine ratio per se correlated with the 24-h proteinuria. Day-to-day variation of proteinuria estimates from samples taken at the same time of the day was of similar magnitude as day-to-day variation of actual 24-h proteinuria. We conclude that the usefulness of the protein:creatinine ratio of a random urine sample for estimation of proteinuria is limited, because of the circadian rhythm of proteinuria. However, samples collected at a fixed time of the day are an acceptable alternative for 24-h urine collections in the clinical follow-up of individual patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koopman et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Glomerular disease with proteinuria (n=30). Protein:creatinine ratio from random or fixed-time urine samples vs. Actually measured 24-h proteinuria was evaluated on Accuracy of estimated 24-h proteinuria compared to actual 24-h proteinuria. Estimating 24-h proteinuria using the protein:creatinine ratio from random urine samples yielded values ranging from 19% to 349% of actual measurements due to circadian rhythm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: