Key result
Provided text fails to report results comparing continuous spinal to single-shot or general anaesthesia.
Why the study?
Hip fractures represent a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems, with high 1-year mortality, reduced life expectancy, and impaired quality of life.
Comparison
Continuous spinal anaesthesia vs single-shot spinal anaesthesia or general anaesthesia
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Either anesthesia mode yields similar mortality and morbidity after hip fracture surgery; extends large observational data but leaves choice to patient factors.
Systematic Review
Koole et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Hip fracture surgery. Continuous spinal anaesthesia vs. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia or general anaesthesia was evaluated on Haemodynamic effects. The provided text is an introduction and does not report the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis comparing continuous spinal anaesthesia to single-shot or general anaesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: