This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent policy and guideline updates that have significant consequences for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and, thus, the prevention of fractures and associated morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent policy trends have sought to reverse reimbursement declines for DXA services, whereas updated guidelines have attempted to restrict the candidates for bone density testing. Recent literature reflects the ongoing controversy of repeat DXA testing. SUMMARY: Patient access to DXA scans has been threatened by declining reimbursement and, therefore, access to diagnosis and fracture prevention. There have been successful efforts to reverse this trend, but the future remains uncertain. The complexities and omissions of updated guidelines for obtaining DXA testing may serve again to restrict initial access, and the recent controversy of repeat DXA testing may make monitoring results of therapy more difficult.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Bobo Tanner (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: