Key result
Paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting using microsurgical techniques resulted in 0% major anastomotic complications requiring reoperation, compared to 16.7% without microvascular techniques.
Why the study?
Does the use of microsurgical techniques improve outcomes and reduce complications in paediatric patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Cohort (n=24)
No
Does the use of microsurgical techniques improve outcomes and reduce complications in paediatric patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
The use of microsurgical techniques in paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting may reduce major anastomotic complications and mortality, particularly in younger and smaller patients.
May reduce anastomotic complications in paediatric CABG; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting is indicated in cases of clinically significant and symptomatic coronary stenosis, with frequent complications occurring in the perioperative period. To reduce complications and improve outcomes of these procedures, surgical microscopes have been used at our centre with the anastomosis performed by a microvascular surgeon. The purpose of this article is to report our institutional experience in all patients who have undergone paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting procedures with and without microvascular techniques. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2000 to May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent bypass without microvascular involvement and 6 patients required the use of microsurgical techniques. Median age at the time of operation was 9.79 and 2.02 years for the 2 groups, respectively. The median weight at the time of operation was 41.2 and 10.75 kg for the 2 groups, respectively. Procedures were performed emergently in 4 patients. Three major anastomotic complications occurred requiring reoperation, although none occurred in the microvascular group. The median follow-up was 3.40 years and 5.25 years for the 2 groups, respectively. Three patients were symptomatic at last follow-up and 2 deaths occurred, all in the non-microvascular group. All grafts were patent in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative ejection fraction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential positive impact of collaboration between cardiac and microvascular surgeons during paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and the subsequent reduction in complications that may be expected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shafarenko et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Clinically significant and symptomatic coronary stenosis (n=24). Coronary artery bypass grafting with microsurgery vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting without microvascular techniques was evaluated on Major anastomotic complications requiring reoperation. Paediatric coronary artery bypass grafting using microsurgical techniques resulted in 0% major anastomotic complications requiring reoperation, compared to 16.7% without microvascular techniques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: