Key result
Tamoxifen linked to ~37% lower ACS risk vs no hormonal treatment in elderly breast cancer patients.
Why the study?
There is controversy regarding the long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Does tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors reduce cardiovascular events in elderly breast cancer patients compared to no hormonal treatment?
Cohort (n=47,569)
Does tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors reduce cardiovascular events in elderly breast cancer patients compared to no hormonal treatment?
Hazard Ratio: 0.63 (95% CI 0.47–0.84)
p-value: p=0.002
In elderly breast cancer patients, tamoxifen therapy is associated with a lower risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to no hormonal treatment, a protective effect not observed with aromatase inhibitors.
Association with lower ACS risk should not change practice; leaves open whether tamoxifen confers cardiovascular benefit in elderly breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred endocrine treatment for postmenopausal hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer. However, there is controversy on the long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of AIs over that of tamoxifen. METHODS: We analyzed the National Health Information Database (NHID) of 281,255 women over a 20-year-old diagnosed with breast cancer between 2009 and 2016. Cardiovascular events (CVEs) were defined as the development of the following, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, defined by using insurance claim records. The model was constructed by Cox proportional hazard regression and this model was used to analyze the effects of AI and tamoxifen on CVE. RESULTS: We included 47,569 women for the final analysis. Patients were classified into 'No hormonal treatment (n = 18,807), 'Switch (n = 2097)', 'Tamoxifen (n = 7081)' and 'AI (n = 19,584)'. There were 2147 CVEs in 2032 patients (4.1%). Univariate analysis showed that women with tamoxifen had significantly lower risk for CVEs compared to no-treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.97) while AI showed no such effect (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.02). After adjusting for other risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history), the use of tamoxifen was associated with significant protective effect against ACS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Our results, based on the NHID, supports the protective effect of tamoxifen against CVE in Korean breast cancer patients aged 55 and older that is not seen with AIs. Our results can guide the selection of adjuvant hormonal treatment agents for Korean breast cancer patients based on their risk of developing CVE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Breast cancer (n=47,569). Tamoxifen vs. No hormonal treatment was evaluated on Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84, p=0.002). Tamoxifen use was associated with a 36% reduced risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to no hormonal treatment in elderly breast cancer patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: