Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: Bioceramic sealers must provide filling and dimensional stability over time. Aims: To evaluate by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the effect of sealer thickness on the physical properties of Bio-C Sealer (BCS) and BioRoot RCS (BR) after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 7 and 30 days. Materials and Methods: = 8), providing a smaller sealer thickness (ST) of the apical third and a greater sealer thickness (GT) of the cervical third. The samples were immersed in PBS for 7 and 30 days. After scanning by micro-CT, the volumetric change, material/dentin interface, and filling capacity were assessed. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA/Tukey, paired, and unpaired t-tests were performed (α =0.05). Results: Sealer thickness did not influence the filling capacity in all conditions tested. After 7 days, BR had a higher volume loss than BCS, with no influence of the sealer thickness. The volumetric loss and percentage of interface gaps were higher for both sealers with GT from 7 to 30 days of immersion. BR with GT showed a higher presence of interface gaps compared to the other groups in all the experimental periods. Conclusions: GT negatively influences the volumetric change and presence of gaps in the material/dentin interface, especially for BR. Both materials demonstrate adequate filling ability regardless of the sealer thickness used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matallana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: