Key result
EV-D68 linked to a ~20-fold higher status asthmaticus rate than rhinovirus in hospitalized children.
Why the study?
Does EV-D68 infection cause different clinical presentations and outcomes compared to rhinovirus in hospitalized children?
Observational (n=103)
Does EV-D68 infection cause different clinical presentations and outcomes compared to rhinovirus in hospitalized children?
Absolute Event Rate: 47.6% vs 2.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
EV-D68 is associated with more severe asthma exacerbations and status asthmaticus compared to rhinovirus in hospitalized children, highlighting its role as a viral trigger for asthma.
May support EV-D68 testing in pediatric status asthmaticus; hypothesis-generating for virus-specific management versus rhinovirus.
BACKGROUND: During the Fall of 2014, numerous children were hospitalized with asthma or respiratory distress related to Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68). A large proportion initially tested positive for rhinovirus. During this period our laboratory noted a cross-reactivity between EV-D68 and the rhinovirus component of the GenMark multiplex respiratory viral panel. Many other laboratories used assays not designed to distinguish these Picornoviridae. METHODS: To compare the presentation and outcomes of patients with rhinovirus and EV-D68, 103 GenMark rhinovirus positive nasopharyngeal swabs from hospitalized children were retested for EV-D68. RESULTS: EV-D68 positive patients versus EV-D68 negative patients were more likely to have a history of asthma (33.3% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.02) and to present with acute respiratory illness (66.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.048), especially status asthmaticus (47.6% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001). On admission they had more wheezing, respiratory distress, and lower respiratory tract involvement, and were more likely to be treated with steroids and discharged home on asthma medications. Respiratory viral coinfection was less common in EV-D68 positive vs EV-D68 negative patients. In patients without a respiratory viral coinfection the overall findings were similar. CONCLUSION: Patients with EV-D68 versus rhinovirus were more likely to have a history of asthma, to present with status asthmaticus, to wheeze on admission, and to receive treatment with asthma medications in hospital and at discharge. The inability of common assays to distinguish EV-D68 from rhinoviruses raises the possibility that the role of EV-D68 as a viral trigger of asthma has been under appreciated. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:827-832.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foster et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Respiratory illness (n=103). Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infection vs. EV-D68 negative (rhinovirus) infection was evaluated on Status asthmaticus (p=<0.001). Hospitalized children with EV-D68 were significantly more likely to present with status asthmaticus compared to those with rhinovirus (47.6% vs. 2.4%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: