Key result
LVEF and dP/dtmax show under ~7% day-to-day variance in conscious dogs, indicating long-term reliability.
dP/dtmax, ejection fraction, and the slope and volume intercept of the SW-EDV relation demonstrate low day-to-day variance, making them reliable indexes for long-term evaluation of left ventricular performance in animal models.
To assess the long-term variance of several parameters of left ventricular performance, we evaluated maximum rate of pressure development (dP/dtmax), ejection fraction, mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (VCF), the slope and volume-axis intercept of the end-systolic pressure-volume (PES-VES) relation, the stroke-work end-diastolic volume (SW-EDV) relation, and the dP/dtmax-EDV relation in six chronically instrumented dogs. Each dog was studied five times over a period of 3 wk in the conscious autonomically intact state, after autonomic blockade, and after administration of anesthesia. For each index under each set of testing conditions, a coefficient of variation was determined, defined as (SD/mean) x 100, and expressed as a percent. In conscious autonomically intact dogs, a low day-to-day variance was present in dP/dtmax (6.4%), ejection fraction (6.8%), mean VCF (6.5%), and the slope and volume intercept of the SW-EDV relation (7.2 and 6.2%), whereas higher variance was seen in the slope and intercept of the PES-VES relation (18.1 and 36.1%). The highest variance was present in parameters of the dP/dtmax-EDV relation. Thus dP/dtmax, ejection fraction, and the slope and volume intercept of the SW-EDV relation may be the most reliable indexes for long-term evaluation of left ventricular performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freeman et al. (1989) studied this question. Left ventricular performance indexes assessment was evaluated on Coefficient of variation of left ventricular performance parameters. Left ventricular performance indexes including dP/dtmax (6.4%) and ejection fraction (6.8%) demonstrated low day-to-day variance in conscious dogs, indicating reliability for long-term evaluation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: