Key result
~86% of European AF patients rate their recent medical care as good or excellent.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,507)
Yes
Most European patients with AF report high satisfaction with their care, though gaps remain in primary/secondary care coordination and patient engagement.
High AF patient satisfaction reported; cross-sectional data leaves open coordination and engagement gaps for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Long-term management of chronic conditions, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), require frequent interactions with the healthcare systems. The multinational EUropean Patient Survey in Atrial Fibrillation (EUPS-AF) was conducted to investigate patient satisfaction with AF management in different of five European healthcare systems at a time of changing treatment paradigms for stroke prophylaxis, prior to the advent of newer oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Adults (>18 years) were recruited at random from the total populations of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK using a randomized telephone dialling system. At least 300 respondents per country reporting to have a diagnosis of AF or receiving oral anticoagulation therapy for suspected AF or to have a heart rhythm disturbance completed a structured telephone interview. RESULTS: Most respondents were satisfied with their treatment for AF over the previous 12 months, with 85.5% (n = 1289) rating their care as good or better. Suboptimal clinical practices, however, were identified in several key areas. Coordination of primary and secondary care and a lack of patient engagement and support were particular issues, especially for those patients likely to have extensive contact with their healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Europe-wide guidelines for management of AF, most patients with AF were satisfied with their care, but for a greater proportion of patients, some aspects are unsatisfactory. Patient-centred surveys, such as the EUPS-AF, are crucial for understanding the factors that contribute to patient satisfaction and compliance with long-term treatment for chronic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhai et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,507). Atrial fibrillation management was evaluated on Patient rating of quality of medical care received in the past 12 months as good, very good, or excellent. Overall, 85.5% of patients with atrial fibrillation across five European countries rated the quality of medical care they received in the previous 12 months as good, very good, or excellent.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: