Key result
Central venous catheters are linked to ~97% higher VTE risk in children with CNS tumors.
Why the study?
Published data on venous thromboembolism rates and risk factors in children with central nervous system tumors are outdated or incomplete.
What is the incidence and what are the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children with central nervous system tumors?
Cohort (n=17,972)
Yes
What is the incidence and what are the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children with central nervous system tumors?
Odds Ratio: 1.97 (95% CI 1.57–2.46)
p-value: p=<.0001
The incidence of VTE in children with CNS tumors is low at approximately 2%, with central venous catheter placement being a significant modifiable risk factor.
CVC-associated VTE risk may prompt closer monitoring in pediatric CNS tumor care; leaves open need for prospective prevention trials.
BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the second most common malignancy of childhood, and published data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate and risk factors for these patients are outdated or incomplete. Here, we determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors for VTE in this population. PROCEDURE: VTE diagnosis and associated clinical risk factors were abstracted and analyzed for two cohorts of children (0-21 years) diagnosed with CNS tumors between January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2018. The first study was a retrospective single institution cohort study. The initial observations were confirmed across multiple pediatric hospitals using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) administrative database. RESULTS: The single-institution cohort included 338 patients aged 3 days to 20.9 years (median age, 8.6 years); VTE developed in eight (2.4%) patients. The PHIS cohort included 17 634 patients aged from 0 to 21.9 years (median: 9.5 years); VTE developed in 354 (2.0%) patients. Univariate analysis for the single-institution cohort identified central venous catheter (CVC) placement as a risk factor for VTE (odds ratio [OR] 8.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-49.41, P = .0186). Multivariable analysis of the PHIS dataset identified CVC placement (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.57-2.46; P < .0001), obesity (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.21-7.26; P = .0177), and more than one hospital admission (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.69-4.64; P < .0001) as significant predictors of VTE. VTE diagnosis was not associated with increased mortality in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The VTE rate in children with CNS tumors is low (2%). CVC placement was identified as a modifiable risk factor in both cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Central nervous system (CNS) tumors (n=17,972). Central venous catheter (CVC) placement vs. No central venous catheter placement was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.57-2.46, p=<.0001). Central venous catheter placement was identified as a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism in children with CNS tumors (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.57-2.46; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: