Key result
Calcium channel blockers are not linked to increased prostate cancer risk versus nonuse.
Why the study?
Does calcium channel blocker use increase the risk of prostate cancer in men under 70 years old?
Case-Control (n=2,617)
Does calcium channel blocker use increase the risk of prostate cancer in men under 70 years old?
Calcium channel blocker use does not appear to increase the risk of prostate cancer, with minor differences in risk estimates likely attributable to detection bias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No increased prostate cancer risk seen with CCBs in case-control data; leaves open any causal link in men under 70 and needs prospective confirmation.
A recent study suggested that the risk of all cancers, including prostate cancer, is increased by the use of calcium channel blockers. The objective of this study was to determine whether prostate cancer is associated with calcium channel blocker use. A case-control study was conducted in Massachusetts using cases diagnosed from December 1992 through February 1995. Cases were men identified by tumor registrars who were less than 70 years old with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Controls were men with no history of prostate cancer or symptoms of undiagnosed prostate cancer, and were matched to the cases on precinct of residence and half-decade of age. A total of 1217 cases of prostate cancer and 1400 community controls are included in this analysis. Data were collected by telephone interview. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate relative risks for calcium channel blockers use while controlling for confounding. The relative risk for prostate cancer for any use of calcium channel blockers relative to nonuse was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-1.5). There was no evidence of a trend according to duration of use. When the analysis was confined to symptomatic men, the relative risk estimate was 1.1 (0.8-1.4) overall and 1.2 (0.8-1.7) among those aged 65 to 69 years. Relative risk estimates for the use of other classes of antihypertensive drugs among symptomatic men were close to 1.0; the corresponding estimates among asymptomatic men were generally further from 1.0. These findings suggest that calcium channel blockers do not increase the risk of prostate cancer. The differences in the relative risk estimates between symptomatic and asymptomatic men are compatible with detection bias. Because of the widespread use of Prostate-Specific Antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer, potential detection bias needs to be considered in future studies of prostate cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vezina et al. (1998) conducted a case-control in Prostate cancer (n=2,617). Calcium channel blockers vs. Nonuse was evaluated on Prostate cancer (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.5). Any use of calcium channel blockers was not significantly associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer compared to nonuse (RR 1.2; 95% CI 0.9-1.5).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: