Key result
Estimated insulin resistance is linked to ~34% lower NT-proBNP in men with metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
Although obesity is known to reduce NT-proBNP levels, data regarding the influence of metabolic syndrome on NT-proBNP concentrations remain equivocal.
Cross-Sectional (n=86)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.4% vs 32.2%
p-value: p=0.014
Insulin resistance is independently associated with lower NT-proBNP levels in men with metabolic syndrome, suggesting that metabolic status should be considered when interpreting this biomarker.
May warrant caution interpreting NT-proBNP in insulin-resistant men with metabolic syndrome; leaves open prognostic implications.
Background. The diagnostic and prognostic role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in heart failure is well established. However, additional factors may influence its concentration. One of them is obesity, which in general is accompanied by reduced NT-proBNP levels. However, specific data concerning metabolic syndrome (MS) are equivocal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of NT-proBNP with estimated insulin resistance (eIR) in men with MS. Methods. In 86 male patients with MS (78 of them hypertensive), blood pressure, anthropometric measures, NT-proBNP, creatinine, glucose, and insulin were assessed and eIR was calculated using homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR). Results. Both eIR and age were independently associated with NT-proBNP concentrations (b = 0.2248, p=0.019 ; b = 0.0102, p=0.049 , respectively). Blood pressure, anthropometric measures, and eGFR were not correlated with NT-proBNP. Patients without eIR had higher NT-proBNP than those with eIR (32.2 ± 26.4 vs 21.4 ± 25.4 pg/mL, p=0.014 ). The difference was even higher in the younger subgroup of patients reaching nearly 50%. Conclusions. Insulin resistance and, to a lesser degree, age were associated with NT-proBNP levels in men with MS. In younger subjects with eIR, mean NT-proBNP level was lower than in corresponding healthy age males.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzesiński et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=86). Estimated insulin resistance (eIR) vs. Patients without eIR was evaluated on NT-proBNP concentration (p=0.014). Estimated insulin resistance was associated with lower NT-proBNP concentrations in men with metabolic syndrome compared to those without insulin resistance (21.4 vs 32.2 pg/mL; p=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: