Key result
Physician-led interprofessional medication assessment reduces bleeding risk and PIMs vs usual care.
Why the study?
Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, prompting an evaluation of whether interprofessional medication assessment affects medication quality in home care patients.
Does physician-led interprofessional medication assessment improve medication quality in elderly home care patients?
RCT (n=512)
Does physician-led interprofessional medication assessment improve medication quality in elderly home care patients?
Physician-led interprofessional medication assessment significantly improves medication quality and reduces the use of potentially inappropriate medications in vulnerable elderly home care patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interprofessional medication assessment improves medication quality in home care; extends RCT evidence for reducing PIMs and specific adverse drug risks in multimorbid older adults.
OBJECTIVE: Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, especially in vulnerable home care patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether interprofessional medication assessment has an effect on medication quality among home care patients. DESIGN: The FIMA (Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment) study was a randomized, controlled study comparing physician-led interprofessional medication assessment and usual care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The FIMA study was conducted in home care settings in Finland. The participants were ≥65-year-old home care patients with ≥6 drugs daily, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, or a recent fall. METHODS: Primary outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up were number of drugs, drug-drug-interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) examined by SFINX, RENBASE, PHARAO, and Meds75+ databases. The databases classified information as follows: A (no known pharmacologic or clinical basis for an increased risk), B (evidence not available/uncertain), C (moderately increased risk which may have clinical relevance), and D (high risk, best to avoid). Logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline level of the outcome measure served as statistical methods. RESULTS: The mean number of all drugs for home care patients (n = 512) was 15. The odds of drug-induced impairment of renal function (RENBASE D, P = .020) and medication-related risk loads for bleeding (PHARAO D, P = .001), anticholinergic effects (PHARAO D, P = .009), and constipation (PHARAO D, P = .003) decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced the odds of using PIMs (Meds75+ D, P = .005). There were no significant changes in drug-drug-interactions or number of drugs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: FIMA intervention improved the medication quality of home care patients. Risks for renal failure, anticholinergic effects, bleeding, constipation, and the use of PIMs were reduced significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Auvinen et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Multimorbidity and complex medications in home care patients (n=512). Physician-led interprofessional medication assessment vs. Usual care was evaluated on Number of drugs, drug-drug-interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Physician-led interprofessional medication assessment significantly reduced the odds of medication-related risk loads for bleeding (P=0.001) and use of potentially inappropriate medications (P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: