Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Duc de Chaulnes’ image-displacement method is refined to account for errors associated with thin slices of crystals and found to give results accurate to ±0.006 in the 2.4-refractive index range. Some of the inherent errors of the method are accounted for exactly, while others are treated statistically. The method has distinct advantages in measuring n at selected sites in solids and in determining indices at ranges above those of useful immersion media. The ordinary-ray index in BaTiO3 was measured on two crystals at room temperature, and the average index determined was 2.369±0.31% (the crystal thicknesses were 0.0126 and 0.0209 cm).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawless et al. (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: