Key result
PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 linked to ~250% higher all-cause mortality in AF patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
The implication of using the PRECISE-DAPT score to predict outcomes, including mortality, in patients with AF undergoing PCI was unknown.
Does a high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25) predict mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=18,850)
Yes
Does a high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25) predict mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
The PRECISE-DAPT score, traditionally used for bleeding risk, is also a strong predictor of long-term mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High PRECISE-DAPT score flags elevated mortality risk in AF-PCI patients; hypothesis-generating for score-guided therapy before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The predicting bleeding complication in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy, PRECISE-DAPT (P-DAPT) score has been validated in large cohorts as an effective tool in predicting bleeding complication after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as well as in predicting in-hospital mortality. The implication of using this score to predict outcomes, including mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Role of P-DAPT score to study clinical outcomes, including mortality, hospitalization, and major bleeding, particularly among patients with AF. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 18,850 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across a large multihospital healthcare system from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified into four groups depending on the presence or absence of AF and P-DAPT score, with score ≥ 25 defined as high risk. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes evaluated were hospitalization and major bleeding. RESULTS: In the unadjusted analyses, a P-DAPT score ≥ 25, in both AF and non-AF population, was associated with increased mortality, hospitalization, and bleeding. After adjusting for baseline covariates, no significant differences in major bleeding risk were found across the four groups. However, a P-DAPT score of ≥25 in AF patients was associated with a higher risk for hospitalizations related to cardiovascular causes (HR: 2.15 95% CI 2.00-2.3, p < .0001). Among AF patients, P-DAPT score ≥ 25 was found to be strongly associated with mortality (HR 3.5; 95% CI 2.95-4.25, p < .0001) as compared with AF patients with score < 25 (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.54, p = .26). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients undergoing PCI, the P-DAPT score can help to identify patients at high risk for long-term mortality, particularly among those with atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asif et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=18,850). PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25 vs. PRECISE-DAPT score < 25 was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 3.5, 95% CI 2.95-4.25, p=<.0001). Among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI, a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 was strongly associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to a score <25 (HR 3.5; 95% CI 2.95-4.25; P<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: