Key result
A clinical and radiomic machine learning model predicts persistent type II endoleak after EVAR with ~0.97 AUC.
Why the study?
Persistent type II endoleak is associated with adverse outcomes after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms, prompting exploration of machine learning for prediction.
Can machine learning algorithms using preoperative clinical and radiomic data predict persistent type II endoleak after EVAR?
Observational
Can machine learning algorithms using preoperative clinical and radiomic data predict persistent type II endoleak after EVAR?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.970 (95% CI 0.901-1)
Machine learning models combining preoperative clinical data and CTA radiomics can accurately predict persistent type II endoleak after EVAR.
May inform preoperative risk stratification after EVAR; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Persistent type II endoleak (T2EL) is associated with adverse outcomes following Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of predicting persistent T2ELs after EVAR using preoperative clinical data and random forest derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent EVAR from January 2019 to June 2023. Based on the postoperative CTA, patients were divided into different groups according to the existence of persistent T2EL. Preoperative clinical data were collected, and radiomic features were extracted from the segmented thrombus in the aneurysm sac of preoperative CTA. Feature selection was performed before machine learning model training. Six common machine learning algorithms were used to predict persistent T2ELs based on preoperative features. Model performance was compared and evaluated. RESULTS: Among the initial 1006 preoperative clinical and radiomic features, 12 features were selected for machine learning model development. The support vector machines (SVMs) classifier performed well in both the training and test sets, with area under the curve values of 0.994 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.967–1) and 0.970 (95% CI, 0.901–1), the sensitivity of 0.927 and 0.882, specificity of 0.979 and 0.920, and accuracy of 0.966 and 0.848, respectively. Based on the DeLong test and decision curve analysis, we concluded that the SVM model had superior predictive performance and clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms utilizing preoperative features may predict persistent T2EL after EVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Support vector machine (SVM) model using preoperative clinical data and radiomic features was evaluated on Prediction of persistent type II endoleak (T2EL) (AUC 0.970, 95% CI 0.901-1). A support vector machine model utilizing preoperative clinical and radiomic features accurately predicted persistent type II endoleak after EVAR with a test set AUC of 0.970 (95% CI 0.901-1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: