Key result
Stress TPD on SPECT MPI links to ~7% higher mortality, whereas SSS does not.
Why the study?
SPECT MPI is used for cardiac allograft vasculopathy surveillance after heart transplant, but data on its prognostic utility remain limited.
Does SPECT MPI provide prognostic utility for all-cause mortality in heart transplant patients undergoing CAV surveillance?
Cohort (n=503)
No
Does SPECT MPI provide prognostic utility for all-cause mortality in heart transplant patients undergoing CAV surveillance?
Hazard Ratio: 1.07
p-value: p=0.018
Quantitative analysis of SPECT MPI (stress TPD) provides modest prognostic accuracy for all-cause mortality in heart transplant patients, suggesting alternative noninvasive modalities may be more suitable for CAV surveillance.
Stress TPD on SPECT MPI was associated with mortality in heart transplant recipients; leaves open its utility for CAV surveillance versus alternatives.
BACKGROUND: Survival after heart transplant has greatly improved, with median survival now over 12 years. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) has become a major source of long-term morbidity and mortality. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is used for CAV surveillance, but there is limited data on its prognostic utility. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients undergoing SPECT MPI for CAV surveillance at a single, large-volume center. Images were assessed with semiquantitative visual scoring (summed stress score [SSS] and summed rest score) and quantitatively with total perfusion defect (TPD). RESULTS: We studied 503 patients (mean age 62.5, 69.3% male) at a median of 9.0 years post-transplant. During mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.5 years, 114 (22.6%) patients died. The diagnostic accuracy for significant CAV (ISHLT grade 2 or 3) was highest for SSS with an area under the curve of 0.650 and stress TPD (area under the curve, 0.648), with no significant difference between SSS and stress TPD (P = 0.061). Stress TPD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; P = 0.018) was independently associated with all-cause mortality, while SSS was not (P = 0.064). The prognostic accuracy of quantitative assessment of perfusion tended to be higher compared with semiquantitative assessment, with the highest accuracy for stress TPD (area under the receiver operating curve 0.584). CONCLUSIONS: While SPECT MPI identified a cohort of higher risk patients, with quantitative analysis of perfusion demonstrating higher prognostic accuracy. However, the overall prognostic accuracy was modest and alternative noninvasive modalities may be more suitable for CAV surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) post-heart transplant (n=503). Stress total perfusion defect (TPD) on SPECT MPI vs. Summed stress score (SSS) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.07, p=0.018). Stress total perfusion defect on SPECT MPI was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.07; P=0.018), whereas summed stress score was not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: