Key result
Women exhibit a ~5% higher stress EF than men, supporting gender-matched SPECT parameters.
Why the study?
Do ejection fraction and other gated stress rest myocardial perfusion parameters differ by age and gender in subjects with normal imaging?
Observational (n=78)
No
Do ejection fraction and other gated stress rest myocardial perfusion parameters differ by age and gender in subjects with normal imaging?
Stress ejection fraction determined by QGSPECT is significantly higher in women than men, suggesting it should be considered a gender-matched normative parameter.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normative QGSPECT ranges may refine EF and volume interpretation in normal perfusion; leaves open prospective validation across populations.
BACKGROUND: We have studied the end-diastolic volume (EDV), the end-systolic volume (ESV), and the ejection fraction (EF) for patients who had normal results on treadmill exercise tests and perfusion scans. We also studied normal wall motion as diagnosed by gated myocardial perfusion imaging with the quantitative gated single photon emission tomography (QGSPECT) software set to launch a range of normal values. In addition, we evaluated differences based on age and gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All subjects with normal results on Bruce exercise and myocardial perfusion imaging QGSPECT using the 2-days stress-rest technetium-99m (99mTc) sestamibi protocol were enrolled in the study. The quantitated functional data of EDV, ESV, and EF using the QGSPECT software were assessed in the rest and stress studies. The association of quantitated functional data with age and sex at both stress and rest was studied in 78 subjects with no symptoms from the cardiovascular system and normal QGSPECT imaging, 29 males (mean age: 58.41 ± 9.0 years) and 49 females (mean age: 58.18 ± 9.0 years). Also studied were differences between males and females. RESULTS: Our results showed that in women compared with men only stress EF showed a significantly higher value (P = 0.02), whereas all other parameters including REF, SESV, SEDV, RESV, and REDV did not demonstrate a significant difference between men and women (P value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study showed that EF as determined by the QGSPECT technique should be considered as gender-matched normative parameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moslehi et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Normal myocardial perfusion (n=78). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Stress ejection fraction (SEF) (p=0.01). Women exhibited a higher stress ejection fraction compared to men, demonstrating that quantitative gated SPECT parameters should be gender-matched.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: