Key result
Low job control predicts ~72% higher incident CHD risk independent of pre-employment factors.
Why the study?
Do adverse psychosocial factors at work increase the risk of incident coronary heart disease independently of pre-employment factors in men?
Cohort (n=6,435)
Do adverse psychosocial factors at work increase the risk of incident coronary heart disease independently of pre-employment factors in men?
Hazard Ratio: 1.72 (95% CI 1.08–2.74)
Adverse psychosocial factors at work independently predict incident coronary heart disease in men, even after adjusting for pre-employment factors like family history and education.
Low job control was associated with incident CHD independent of pre-employment factors; hypothesis-generating, prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the association between psychosocial factors at work and incident coronary heart disease (CHD) is explained by pre-employment factors, such as family history of CHD, education, paternal education and social class, number of siblings and height. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 6435 British men aged 35-55 years at phase 1 (1985-1988) and free from prevalent CHD at phase 2 (1989-1990) was conducted. Psychosocial factors at work were assessed at phases 1 and 2 and mean scores across the two phases were used to determine long-term exposure. Selected pre-employment factors were assessed at phase 1. Follow-up for coronary death, first non-fatal myocardial infarction or definite angina between phase 2 and 1999 was based on clinical records (250 events, follow-up 8.7 years). RESULTS: The selected pre-employment factors were associated with risk for CHD: HRs (95% CI) were 1.33 (1.03 to 1.73) for family history of CHD, 1.18 (1.05 to 1.32) for each quartile decrease in height and 1.16 (0.99 to 1.35) for each category increase in number of siblings. Psychosocial work factors also predicted CHD: 1.72 (1.08 to 2.74) for low job control and 1.72 (1.10 to 2.67) for low organisational justice. Adjustment for pre-employment factors changed these associations by 4.1% or less. CONCLUSIONS: In this occupational cohort of British men, the association between psychosocial factors at work and CHD was largely independent of family history of CHD, education, paternal educational attainment and social class, number of siblings and height.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hintsa et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in coronary heart disease (n=6,435). Psychosocial factors at work (low job control and low organisational justice) was evaluated on coronary death, first non-fatal myocardial infarction or definite angina (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.08-2.74). Low job control predicted incident coronary heart disease (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.08-2.74), an association largely independent of pre-employment factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: