Key result
Treated DBP of 100 mmHg linked to ~45% higher MI risk versus 84 mmHg.
Why the study?
Does the level of treated blood pressure affect the incidence of myocardial infarction in treated hypertensive patients?
Case-Control (n=912)
Does the level of treated blood pressure affect the incidence of myocardial infarction in treated hypertensive patients?
In treated hypertensive patients, there is a J-shaped relationship between diastolic blood pressure and myocardial infarction risk, suggesting an optimal target range of 84 to 90 mm Hg.
Treated DBP may warrant caution against excessive lowering in hypertensives; this Level 4 evidence leaves optimal targets unresolved pending RCTs.
To examine the association between the level of treated blood pressure and the incidence of myocardial infarction, we conducted a population-based case-control study of 912 members of a health maintenance organization who were receiving standard clinical treatment for hypertension. We found a J-shaped relationship between the most recently measured diastolic blood pressure and the risk of myocardial infarction, the lowest risk occurring at 84 mm Hg. The relative risk of myocardial infarction at 60 mm Hg was 2.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.01), and at 100 mm Hg, 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.06). Treated systolic pressure bore a linear relationship to the risk of infarction. We conclude that the optimum target range for diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients may be 84 to 90 mm Hg. Levels outside this range may be associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction. (Arch Intern Med.1992;152:513-520)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leanne McCloskey (1992) conducted a case-control in Hypertension (n=912). Treated diastolic blood pressure vs. Diastolic blood pressure of 84 mm Hg was evaluated on Incidence of myocardial infarction (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.06). Treated diastolic blood pressure exhibited a J-shaped relationship with myocardial infarction risk, with a relative risk of 1.45 (95% CI 1.02-2.06) at 100 mm Hg compared to the lowest risk at 84 mm Hg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: