Key result
Baseline fQRS linked to ~236% higher risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome.
Why the study?
Does baseline fragmented QRS increase the risk of major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,360)
Does baseline fragmented QRS increase the risk of major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Relative Risk: 3.36 (95% CI 2.09–5.38)
p-value: p=<.001
Baseline fragmented QRS is associated with an up to 3-fold increased risk of major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome, suggesting its utility for risk assessment.
fQRS signals higher arrhythmic risk in Brugada syndrome; leaves open its integration into risk stratification pending prospective validation.
Background Fragmented QRS reflects disturbances in the myocardium predisposing the heart to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Recent studies suggest that fragmented QRS ( fQRS ) is associated with major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome. However, a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature has not been done. We assessed the association between fQRS and major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome by a systematic review of the literature and a meta‐analysis. Methods We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2017. Included studies were published prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared major arrhythmic events (ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, sudden cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death) in Brugada syndrome with fQRS versus normal QRS . Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results Nine studies from January 2012 to May 2017 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 2,360 subjects with Brugada syndrome (550 fQRS and 1,810 non‐ fQRS ). Fragmented QRS was associated with major arrhythmic events (pooled risk ratio =3.36, 95% confidence interval: 2.09‐5.38, p < .001, I 2 = 50.9%) as well as fatal arrhythmia (pooled risk ratio =3.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.40‐6.86, p = .005, I 2 = 69.7%). Conclusions Baseline fQRS increased major arrhythmic events up to 3‐fold. Our study suggests that fQRS could be an important tool for risk assessment in patients with Brugada syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rattanawong et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Brugada syndrome (n=2,360). Fragmented QRS vs. Normal QRS was evaluated on Major arrhythmic events (ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, sudden cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death) (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.09-5.38, p=<.001). Baseline fragmented QRS was associated with a more than 3-fold increased risk of major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome (RR 3.36; 95% CI 2.09-5.38; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: