Why the study?
The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in mitigating the risk of AF remains unknown.
Do GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is increase the risk of atrial fibrillation compared to other drugs in the FAERS database?
Observational
Do GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is increase the risk of atrial fibrillation compared to other drugs in the FAERS database?
Odds Ratio: 2.56 (95% CI 2.1–3.12)
Pharmacovigilance data suggests a potential increased risk of atrial fibrillation with DPP-4 inhibitors and liraglutide, warranting further clinical investigation.
The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in mitigating the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown. We interrogated the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to study the association between AF-related adverse events and the use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4i. A signal of disproportionate reporting of AF was detected with the DPP-4i group compared with all the other drugs in the FAERS database [ROR, 2.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.10-3.12], whereas there was no disproportionality signal detected with the GLP-1 RA group (ROR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.03) although liraglutide showed a significant disproportionality signal (ROR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.00-3.15). Our analysis supports the existing body of literature demonstrating the cardiac safety of GLP-1 RA but raises concerns about the apparent increase in the risk of AF associated with DPP-4i. Further clinical and translational studies are needed to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thotamgari et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Diabetes. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) vs. All other drugs in the FAERS database was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation-related adverse events (ROR 2.56, 95% CI 2.10-3.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: