Key result
GLP-1 RA therapy fails to reduce incident atrial fibrillation in obese patients with HFpEF.
Why the study?
Does GLP-1 RA therapy reduce the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in obese, non-diabetic patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=940)
Yes
Does GLP-1 RA therapy reduce the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in obese, non-diabetic patients with HFpEF?
Hazard Ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.53–1.39)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 9%
p-value: p=0.543
In obese, non-diabetic patients with HFpEF, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower all-cause mortality but did not significantly reduce the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
No association with lower AF incidence in this cohort; leaves open whether GLP-1 RAs affect arrhythmia risk in obese HFpEF.
Background Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) reduce cardiovascular risk in obesity, but their effect on atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. Methods We analyzed TriNetX data comparing obese, non‐diabetic HFpEF patients treated with GLP‐1 RAs ( n = 478) with untreated patients ( n = 6887). Propensity matching yielded 470 patients per cohort. Results GLP‐1 RA therapy was not associated with reduced AF incidence (HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.53–1.39; p = 0.543) but was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23–0.75; p = 0.003). Conclusions GLP‐1 RAs may not reduce AF incidence in obese, HFpEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rassam et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Obese, non-diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=940). GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, liraglutide, or tirzepatide) vs. No GLP-1 RA therapy was evaluated on New onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.53-1.39, p=0.543). GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.53-1.39, p=0.543) compared to no GLP-1 RA therapy in obese, non-diabetic patients with HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: