Key result
Fixed-dose lercanidipine plus enalapril effectively controls blood pressure in hypertension.
Why the study?
Does a fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril improve blood pressure control in elderly patients with hypertension?
Does a fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril improve blood pressure control in elderly patients with hypertension?
A fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril is an efficacious and well-tolerated option for achieving blood pressure targets in elderly hypertensive patients.
May support fixed-dose lercanidipine-enalapril for hypertension control; leaves open randomized confirmation.
Inadequate control of blood pressure markedly increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity associated with hypertension. Subsequently, official guidelines recommend blood pressure targets of 140/90 mmHg in every patient and even lower in high-risk groups. Nevertheless, more than 30% of hypertensive-treated patients do not reach these levels. Fixed-dose combinations of different agents are a valuable option in the management of hypertension. A combination of a calcium-channel antagonist and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor has a pharmacological rationale and is particularly beneficial. It is worth noting that the third generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker, lercanidipine, exhibits peculiar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics and a good tolerability profile. Its coadministration with enalapril either as an add-on drug or as a fixed-dose combination therapy, has especially been proven to be efficacious in attaining blood pressure control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzikyrkou et al. (2009) conducted a review in Hypertension. Fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril was evaluated on Blood pressure control. Coadministration of lercanidipine with enalapril as a fixed-dose combination therapy is efficacious in attaining blood pressure control in hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: