Key result
Once-daily enalapril/lercanidipine lowers BP and offers potential target organ protection versus monotherapy.
Why the study?
Does fixed-dose combination therapy with enalapril/lercanidipine improve blood pressure control and target organ protection in patients with essential hypertension compared to monotherapy?
Does fixed-dose combination therapy with enalapril/lercanidipine improve blood pressure control and target organ protection in patients with essential hypertension compared to monotherapy?
Fixed-dose combination therapy with enalapril/lercanidipine offers an effective and physiologic approach to achieving blood pressure targets in essential hypertension.
May warrant consideration pending RCTs; leaves open whether target organ benefits exceed those of monotherapy in practice.
Achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control is the most important single issue in the management of hypertension, and in most patients, it is difficult or impossible to achieve target levels with one drug. Blocking two or more regulatory systems provides a more effective and more physiologic reduction in BP, and current guidelines have recommended the use of combination therapy as first-line treatment, or early in the management of hypertension. Fixed-dose combination therapy is an efficacious, relatively safe and cost-effective treatment option in most patients with essential hypertension. Of note, the once-daily administration of a fixed-dose enalapril/lercanidipine, by bringing together two distinct and complementary mechanisms of action, reduces BP effectively and has the potential for improved target organ protection relative to either class agent alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzikyrkou et al. (2009) conducted a review in hypertension. fixed-dose enalapril/lercanidipine vs. either class agent alone was evaluated. Once-daily fixed-dose enalapril/lercanidipine effectively reduces blood pressure and offers potential for improved target organ protection compared to either agent alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: