Key result
Phenylephrine yields similar umbilical artery pH to norepinephrine when treating postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic women.
Why the study?
Studies comparing phenylephrine and norepinephrine for the treatment of postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic patients are limited.
Does intravenous phenylephrine compared to norepinephrine improve umbilical artery pH in pre-eclamptic women with postspinal hypotension during caesarean section?
RCT (n=86)
Double-blind
Randomised
No
Does intravenous phenylephrine compared to norepinephrine improve umbilical artery pH in pre-eclamptic women with postspinal hypotension during caesarean section?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.26% vs 7.27%
p-value: p=0.903
Bolus doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine are equally effective for treating postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic women undergoing caesarean section, with similar neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Supports use of either bolus agent for postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic caesarean delivery; extends RCT evidence of comparable neonatal acid-base balance to this population.
BACKGROUND: Studies comparing phenylephrine and norepinephrine for the treatment of postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic patients are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare bolus doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine for treating hypotension in pre-eclamptic mothers undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. It was hypothesised that norepinephrine and phenylephrine use would be associated with similar neonatal outcome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. SETTING: Single centre, tertiary care, university teaching hospital, from December 2018 to March 2020. PATIENTS: A total of 86 women with pre-eclampsia and a singleton pregnancy who developed postspinal hypotension during caesarean section. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received intravenous phenylephrine (50 μg) or norepinephrine (4 μg) for treatment of hypotension, defined as a fall in baseline systolic BP by ≥ 20% or an absolute value < 100 mmHg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was umbilical artery pH. Secondary outcomes included Apgar scores, the number of hypotensive episodes, vasopressor requirements, the incidence of tachycardia/bradycardia/arrhythmias/hypertension and maternal complications. RESULTS: Umbilical artery pH was not different between the phenylephrine and norepinephrine groups (7.26 ± 0.06 and 7.27 ± 0.06, respectively; P = 0.903). The median [IQR] number of hypotensive episodes was higher in the norepinephrine than the phenylephrine group: 2 [1 to 3] vs 1 [1 to 2], respectively; P = 0.014. Apgar scores, total number of vasopressor boluses required, systolic BP trends and the incidence of maternal complications were comparable in the two groups. Heart rate (HR) values were lower in phenylephrine group (P = 0.026), and one patient in phenylephrine group and none in the norepinephrine group developed bradycardia (HR < 50 bpm), P = 1.000. CONCLUSIONS: In women with pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section, bolus doses of phenylephrine (50 μg) and norepinephrine (4 μg) used to treat hypotension after spinal anaesthesia are equally effective with similar neonatal and maternal outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2018/11/016478.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohta et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Pre-eclampsia with postspinal hypotension during caesarean section (n=86). Phenylephrine vs. Norepinephrine (4 μg) was evaluated on Umbilical artery pH (p=0.903). Bolus doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine resulted in similar umbilical artery pH (7.26 vs 7.27; P=0.903) when treating postspinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic women undergoing caesarean section.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: