Key result
Vorapaxar reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding in ACS or stable atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
Does vorapaxar reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable atherosclerosis?
Does vorapaxar reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable atherosclerosis?
Vorapaxar reduces ischemic events in stable atherosclerosis but significantly increases bleeding, suggesting potential benefit only in patients with prior myocardial infarction and no history of stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vorapaxar demands bleeding risk assessment in ACS or stable atherosclerosis; leaves open refined net-benefit selection in prior MI without stroke.
Vorapaxar is the first substance of a new class of antiplatelet drugs that has been tested in large clinical trials. The protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation to prevent atherothrombosis. In the phase 3 trials TRACER (acute coronary syndrome) and TRA 2P-TIMI 50 (stable atherosclerosis) reducing ischemic events with vorapaxar came at the cost of bleeding. TRACER compared vorapaxar to placebo in 12,944 patients who had non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes on top of contemporary treatment including dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel). Vorapaxar reduced ischemic events non-significantly, but increased bleeding significantly, therefore not justifying triple antiplatelet therapy in this setting. Follow-up was stopped early because of bleeding. TRA 2P-TIMI 50 examined 26,449 patients who had a history of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease. Vorapaxar reduced ischemic events and increased bleeding both significantly. Recruitment of patients with prior stroke was stopped early. Net clinical outcome and subgroup analyses suggested that vorapaxar could be beneficial for patients with prior myocardial infarction - but no history of stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bode et al. (2012) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome and stable atherosclerosis (n=39,393). Vorapaxar vs. Placebo was evaluated on Ischemic events. Vorapaxar reduced ischemic events but significantly increased bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable atherosclerosis, with potential benefit in prior MI without stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: