Key result
Postexercise ECG variations occur in ~11% of healthy men and associate with resting BP differences.
Why the study?
Do postexercise electrocardiographic responses change over time in healthy middle-aged men undergoing annual maximal exercise testing?
Cohort (n=191)
Do postexercise electrocardiographic responses change over time in healthy middle-aged men undergoing annual maximal exercise testing?
Sequential variations in postexercise ECG responses occur in a subset of healthy men over time and correlate with differences in resting blood pressure.
Postexercise ECG variations should not yet alter clinical interpretation; hypothesis-generating for resting BP associations in observational cohorts.
Analysis of the postexercise electrocardiographic responses to the third annual test of maximal exercise with a multistage treadmill test (rather than a step test) in 191 middle-aged American men revealed inter-observer differences in interpretation in 5% of the men. Sequential variations which were found in 11% of 186 men who were tested three times in a period of three years demonstrated the potentiality for changes in this response. Only men with changing electrocardiographic responses showed significant intergroup differences in resting blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations. Covariance analysis revealed significant differences in age-adjusted, and particularly in height-adjusted mean values for resting blood pressure in relation to electrocardiographic responses to maximal exertion. There were no comparable differences in age-adjusted cholesterol levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albert S. Most (1968) conducted a cohort in Healthy (n=191). Maximal exercise with a multistage treadmill test was evaluated on Postexercise electrocardiographic responses. Sequential variations in postexercise electrocardiographic responses occurred in 11% of healthy middle-aged men over 3 years, and were associated with differences in resting blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: