Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of a CO 2 value chain in Europe, including carbon capture (CC) and transport and storage (T&S), is strongly influenced by carbon dioxide removal (CDR) markets and industry relocation, complicating investments on the CC and the T&S operator's side. We investigate how these two factors affect the industrial CC landscape characterized by scale economies and complementary markets. A spatially explicit optimization model is applied to a case study encompassing Northwestern Europe. By endogenizing CC and T&S within the model, we demonstrate the pivotal role of industry clusters in rolling out a CO 2 value chain. CDR credits especially could create substantially increased capture volumes, as biogenic CC becomes competitive. The resulting T&S scale economies allow sites with a low participation willingness to join the CO 2 value chain. In contrast, under scenarios with substantial industry leakage, scale advantages diminish, causing a higher risk of exclusion for small or remote emitters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verbist et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: