Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
By maintaining that moral functioning depends upon four components (sensitivity, judgment, motivation, and character), the Neo-Kohlbergian account of moral functioning allows for uneven moral development within individuals. However, I argue that the four-component model does not go far enough. I offer a more accurate account of moral functioning and uneven moral development. My proposal retains the account of sensitivity, divides the judgment component into a theorizing component and a reasoning component, and eliminates the motivation and character components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard J. Curzer (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: