Key result
CFD correlates with TCD for physiological cerebral velocity changes despite differing absolute measures.
Why the study?
Understanding cerebral artery haemodynamic responses to physiological stimuli is important for understanding brain perfusion regulation, but direct measurement remains challenging.
Does computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation correlate with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for measuring cerebral velocity waveform metrics in healthy participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=12)
No
Does computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation correlate with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for measuring cerebral velocity waveform metrics in healthy participants?
Effect estimate: r=0.577-0.770
p-value: p=<0.05
While absolute measures of cerebral velocity differ between TCD and 3D CFD simulation, physiological changes from resting levels are significantly correlated between the two techniques.
Cerebrovascular haemodynamics are sensitive to multiple physiological stimuli that require synergistic response to maintain adequate perfusion. Understanding haemodynamic changes within cerebral arteries is important to inform how the brain regulates perfusion, however methods for direct measurement of cerebral haemodynamics in these environments is challenging. The aim of this study was to assess velocity waveform metrics obtained using transcranial Doppler (TCD) with flow conserving subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) simulations relying on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Twelve healthy participants underwent head and neck imaging with 3 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography. Velocity waveforms in the middle cerebral (MCA) artery were measured with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) while diameter and velocity was measured using duplex ultrasound in the internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) arteries to calculate incoming cerebral flow at rest, during hypercapnia and exercise. CFD simulations were developed for each condition, with velocity waveform metrics extracted in the same insonation region as TCD. Exposure to stimuli induced significant changes in cardiorespiratory measures across all participants. Absolute measured TCD velocities were significantly higher than those calculated from CFD (all P < 0.05), and these data were not correlated across conditions (r range 0.030–0.377, all P > 0.05). However, relative changes in velocity from resting levels exhibited significant positive correlations when the distinct techniques were compared (r range 0.577–0.770, all P < 0.05). Our data indicate that whilst absolute measures of cerebral velocity differ between TCD and 3D CFD simulation, physiological changes from resting levels in time-averaged velocity are significantly correlated between these techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caddy et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=12). Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) vs. Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (TCD) was evaluated on Correlation of relative changes in velocity from resting levels (r=0.577-0.770, p=<0.05). While absolute measures of cerebral velocity differed, physiological changes from resting levels in time-averaged velocity were significantly correlated between CFD and TCD techniques (r range 0.577-0.770, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: