Key result
In a study of 72 patients having midline abdominal surgery, erector spinae plane (ESP) block significantly decreased analgesic consumption compared to rectus sheath block.
Why the study?
Does erector spinae plane block reduce analgesic consumption compared to rectus sheath block in patients having midline abdominal surgery?
Does erector spinae plane block reduce analgesic consumption compared to rectus sheath block in patients having midline abdominal surgery?
Erector spinae plane block may significantly reduce analgesic consumption compared to rectus sheath block in midline abdominal surgery, offering a potential alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia in low-resource settings.
A double blind randomised controlled study conducted in Ethiopia in 72 patients having midline abdominal surgery and comparing rectus sheath block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block showed a signi fi cant decrease in analgesic consumption in favour of the latter [1]. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is still considered the gold standard for most open abdominal procedures, the realities of cost-effectiveness, follow-up support and the lack of neuraxial training present signi fi cant challenges in any setting. It is, therefore, intriguing to compare how these fascial plane blocks perform relative toone another.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coppens et al. (2024) conducted a letter in Midline abdominal surgery (n=72). Erector spinae plane (ESP) block vs. Rectus sheath block was evaluated on Analgesic consumption. In a study of 72 patients having midline abdominal surgery, erector spinae plane (ESP) block significantly decreased analgesic consumption compared to rectus sheath block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: