Key result
Plasma RNA metagenomics show no microbial differences in ME/CFS or ADCLS versus controls.
Why the study?
Does metagenomic analysis of plasma RNA identify specific infectious agents in individuals with ME/CFS compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=74)
No
Does metagenomic analysis of plasma RNA identify specific infectious agents in individuals with ME/CFS compared to controls?
Metagenomic analysis of plasma in ME/CFS patients reveals that apparent microbial differences are largely driven by contamination and batch effects, emphasizing the critical need for technical controls in microbiome studies.
Plasma metagenomics does not support detecting infectious agents in ME/CFS; leaves open whether rigorous contamination controls can unmask subtle signals.
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disease causing indefinite fatigue. ME/CFS has long been hypothesised to have an infectious cause; however, no specific infectious agent has been identified. We used metagenomics to analyse the RNA from plasma samples from 25 individuals with ME/CFS and compare their microbial content to technical controls as well as three control groups: individuals with alternatively diagnosed chronic Lyme syndrome (N = 13), systemic lupus erythematosus (N = 11), and healthy controls (N = 25). We found that the majority of sequencing reads were removed during host subtraction, thus there was very low microbial RNA content in the plasma. The effects of sample batching and contamination during sample processing proved to outweigh the effects of study group on microbial RNA content, as the few differences in bacterial or viral RNA abundance we did observe between study groups were most likely caused by contamination and batch effects. Our results highlight the importance of including negative controls in all metagenomic analyses, since there was considerable overlap between bacterial content identified in study samples and control samples. For example, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteriodes were found in both study samples and plasma-free negative controls. Many of the taxonomic groups we saw in our plasma-free negative control samples have previously been associated with diseases, including ME/CFS, demonstrating how incorrect conclusions may arise if controls are not used and batch effects not accounted for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Alternatively Diagnosed Chronic Lyme Syndrome (ADCLS) (n=74). ME/CFS or ADCLS vs. Healthy controls and SLE controls was evaluated on Differences in bacterial or viral RNA abundance in plasma. Metagenomic analysis of plasma RNA revealed no significant differences in microbial content between individuals with ME/CFS or ADCLS and controls, with observed variations primarily driven by sample contamination and batch effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: