Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction The traditional dichotomy between antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and T cell– mediated rejection (TCMR) after kidney transplantation is increasingly challenged. While T cell populations and their clonal expansion have been demonstrated in TCMR, the involvement and clonality of T cells remains unexplored in AMR. Methods Kidney transplant biopsy datasets from four independent cohorts (192 cases bulk transcriptomics, 16 cases of single-cell RNA/TCR sequencing, along with 18 and 75 cases of multiplex immunostaining) were analyzed to characterize CD4 + and CD8 + T cell enrichment, clonal expansion and spatial organization in AMR and microvascular inflammation (MVI). Results Deconvolution of bulk transcriptomes showed a significant enrichment of CD8 + T cells in 33 AMR/MVI samples versus 139 no rejection, with comparable levels between AMR/MVI and 20 (borderline)TCMR cases. Unsupervised clustering of scRNA-Seq data identified five major T cell clusters. Clonal expansion was mostly present in CD8 + Tem/Temra cells, CD4 + cytotoxic T cells and CD8 + HLA-DR + CD27 + T cells. The CD4 + Naïve/Tcm cluster was mostly not expanded. The last CD8 + cluster was characterized by early activation markers (CD69 + , FOS + , JUN + ) and intermediate clonality. The four AMR biopsies had the highest proportion of clonally expanded T cells, most notably in early AMR cases in patients with pre-existing donor-specific antibodies without histological diagnosis of TCMR in three cases. Both the fraction of expanded T cells and the number of distinct expanded clones correlated with the PIRCHE-II score, which estimates the number of donor HLA-derived epitopes presented by the recipient's HLA molecules. Finally, spatial proteomics confirmed the T-cell enrichment in the intravascular and glomerular compartments of AMR/MVI biopsies. Conclusions We demonstrated the presence of clonally expanded CD4 + and CD8 + cytotoxic T cells in early AMR biopsies with pre-existing donor-specific antibodies without histological diagnosis of TCMR. These findings highlight a level of complexity in the cellular mechanisms of rejection not currently captured by routine histology, suggesting that the dichotomy between AMR and TCMR needs reconsidering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaulet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: