Key result
Low socioeconomic status linked to ~28% higher risk of composite cardiovascular events.
Why the study?
This study investigated the impact of socioeconomic status on obstructive coronary artery disease presence and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.
Does low socioeconomic status increase the risk of composite cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
Cohort (n=9,530)
Does low socioeconomic status increase the risk of composite cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low socioeconomic status is independently associated with a 28% increased risk of long-term composite cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography, despite similar baseline rates of obstructive CAD.
This retrospective study investigated the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease, focusing on obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) presence and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Analyzing data from 9530 patients categorized by health insurance type (medical aid beneficiaries (MABs) as the low SES group; national health insurance beneficiaries (NHIBs) as the high SES group), this research explores the relationship between SES and outcomes. Despite a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, the MAB group exhibited similar rates of obstructive CAD compared to the NHIB group. However, over a median 3.5-year follow-up, the MAB group experienced a higher incidence of composite cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke, compared with the NHIB group (20.2% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, revealed independently worse clinical outcomes for the MAB group (adjusted odds ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.54; p = 0.006). Despite comparable CAD rates, this study underscores the fact that individuals with low SES encounter an elevated risk of composite cardiovascular events, emphasizing the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and heightened susceptibility to cardiovascular disease, even among those already at high risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in High risk of cardiovascular disease undergoing invasive coronary angiography (n=9,530). Low socioeconomic status (medical aid beneficiaries) vs. High socioeconomic status (national health insurance beneficiaries) was evaluated on Composite cardiovascular events (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke) (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, p=0.006). Low socioeconomic status was associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular events compared to high socioeconomic status (20.2% vs. 16.2%; adjusted OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.54; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: