Key result
Exercise Doppler echocardiography interpretation yields ~100% accuracy across experienced labs versus core lab.
Why the study?
Quality control was needed to assess resting and exercise Doppler echocardiography variables measured across experienced laboratories in the RIGHT Heart International NETwork.
Is exercise Doppler echocardiography of the right heart and pulmonary circulation reproducible across multiple expert centers?
Observational (n=10)
Single-blind
Yes
Is exercise Doppler echocardiography of the right heart and pulmonary circulation reproducible across multiple expert centers?
Effect estimate: ICC > 0.90
p-value: p=<0.0001
When performed in expert centers, exercise Doppler echocardiography is a highly accurate and reproducible tool for assessing the right heart and pulmonary circulation.
Supports use in expert centers; leaves open generalizability to routine practice.
PURPOSE: This study was a quality-control study of resting and exercise Doppler echocardiography (EDE) variables measured by 19 echocardiography laboratories with proven experience participating in the RIGHT Heart International NETwork. METHODS: All participating investigators reported the requested variables from ten randomly selected exercise stress tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to evaluate the inter-observer agreement with the core laboratory. Inter-observer variability of resting and peak exercise tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), right ventricular outflow tract acceleration time (RVOT Act), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tissue Doppler tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (S'), right ventricular fractional area change (RV FAC), left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), mitral inflow pulsed wave Doppler velocity (E), diastolic mitral annular velocity by TDI (e') and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured. RESULTS: The accuracy of 19 investigators for all variables ranged from 99.7 to 100%. ICC was > 0.90 for all observers. Inter-observer variability for resting and exercise variables was for TRV = 3.8 to 2.4%, E = 5.7 to 8.3%, e' = 6 to 6.5%, RVOT Act = 9.7 to 12, LVOT VTI = 7.4 to 9.6%, S' = 2.9 to 2.9% and TAPSE = 5.3 to 8%. Moderate inter-observer variability was found for resting and peak exercise RV FAC (15 to 16%). LVEF revealed lower resting and peak exercise variability of 7.6 and 9%. CONCLUSIONS: When performed in expert centers EDE is a reproducible tool for the assessment of the right heart and the pulmonary circulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrara et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Pulmonary Hypertension (n=10). Exercise Doppler echocardiography interpretation vs. Core laboratory measurements (gold standard) was evaluated on Inter-observer agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient) and accuracy of resting and exercise Doppler echocardiography variables (ICC > 0.90, p=<0.0001). Exercise Doppler echocardiography interpretation by 19 experienced laboratories showed an accuracy ranging from 99.7% to 100% and an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90 for all observers compared to the core laboratory.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: