Key result
Bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid maintains normal acid-base status after bypass initiation vs Plasma-Lyte 148.
Why the study?
Fluid-induced metabolic acidosis can be harmful and complicate cardiopulmonary bypass.
Does a bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid prevent metabolic acidosis compared to Plasma-Lyte 148 in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
RCT (n=20)
Single-blind
1:1
Does a bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid prevent metabolic acidosis compared to Plasma-Lyte 148 in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
A bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid maintains normal acid-base status during cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas Plasma-Lyte 148 induces a mild metabolic acidosis and a surge of unmeasured anions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor bicarbonate-balanced prime to avoid early acidosis on CPB initiation; leaves open whether anion surges affect outcomes.
Fluid-induced metabolic acidosis can be harmful and can complicate cardiopulmonary bypass. In an attempt to prevent this disturbance, we designed a bicarbonate-based crystalloid circuit prime balanced on physico-chemical principles with a strong ion difference of 24 mEq/l and compared its acid-base effects with those of Plasma-Lyte 148, a multiple electrolyte replacement solution containing acetate plus gluconate totalling 50 mEq/l. Twenty patients with normal acid-base status undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomised 1:1 to a 2 litre prime of either bicarbonate-balanced fluid or Plasma-Lyte 148. With the trial fluid, metabolic acid-base status was normal following bypass initiation (standard base excess 0.1 (1.3) mEq/l, mean, SD), whereas Plasma-Lyte 148 produced a slight metabolic acidosis (standard base excess -2.2 (2.1) mEq/l). Estimated group difference after baseline adjustment was 3.6 mEq/l (95% confidence interval 2.1 to 5.1 mEq/l, P=0.0001). By late bypass, mean standard base excess in both groups was normal (0.8 (2.2) mEq/l vs. -0.8 (1.3) mEq/l, P=0.5). Strong ion gap values were unaltered with the trial fluid, but with Plasma-Lyte 148 increased significantly on bypass initiation (15.2 (2.5) mEq/l vs. 2.5 (1.5) mEq/l, P < 0.0001), remaining elevated in late bypass (8.4 (3.4) mEq/l vs. 5.8 (2.4) mEq/l, P < 0.05). We conclude that a bicarbonate-based crystalloid with a strong ion difference of 24 mEq/l is balanced for cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with normal acid-base status, whereas Plasma-Lyte 148 triggers a surge of unmeasured anions, persisting throughout bypass. These are likely to be gluconate and/or acetate. Whether surges of exogenous anions during bypass can be harmful requires further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Elective cardiac surgery (n=20). Bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid vs. Plasma-Lyte 148 was evaluated on Standard base excess following bypass initiation (MD 3.6, 95% CI 2.1 to 5.1, p=0.0001). A bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid maintained normal acid-base status following cardiopulmonary bypass initiation compared to Plasma-Lyte 148 (mean difference 3.6 mEq/l; 95% CI 2.1-5.1; P=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: