Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Framework review evaluates macrophage phagocytosis checkpoints in DLBCL immunotherapy, highlighting differing levels of clinical maturity from CD47 to CD200.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is treated with an expanding range of antibody- and cell-based therapies, yet macrophage phagocytosis checkpoints are still often discussed one molecule at a time. Here, we ask how far the evidence for each major axis has actually progressed in DLBCL immunotherapy. We considered five areas of support: lymphoma protein-level evidence, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), in vivo lymphoma data, clinical lymphoma evidence, and biomarker or predictive relevance. CD47/SIRPalpha remains the reference point because it has the broadest mechanistic, lymphoma, and clinical support. Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)/leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B1 (LILRB1) and CD39/CD73-adenosine signaling have meaningful lymphoma-related functional evidence but remain less mature clinically. CD24/Siglec-10 is still best regarded as candidate/emerging. CD200/CD200R sits at a different stage: its myeloid biology, receptor structure, and Dok2-RasGAP signaling make it a credible candidate, but a direct DLBCL experiment showing restoration of anti-CD20 ADCP after pathway blockade is still lacking. We also consider how these pathways may be shaped by Fc receptor competence, spatial tumor-macrophage contact, anti-CD19 therapy, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T-cell therapy. The purpose of the framework is practical: to separate what is already supported in lymphoma from what still needs to be tested before clinical claims are made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: