Key result
Basketball-specific MIIT increases SOD by ~2 U/mL and decreases MDA versus routine training.
Why the study?
The effects of basketball-specific interval training on antioxidant, nitric oxide-related, and muscle-metabolic biomarkers remained unclear.
Does basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training improve antioxidant and muscle-metabolic biomarkers in competitive male basketball players?
RCT (n=23)
simple individual randomization
Does basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training improve antioxidant and muscle-metabolic biomarkers in competitive male basketball players?
Eight weeks of basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training improved specific antioxidant markers (increased SOD, decreased MDA) in competitive male basketball players.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MIIT may favorably alter antioxidant and metabolic biomarkers in players; extends performance trials to biochemical adaptations in basketball.
Background Basketball-specific interval training combines cardiovascular, mechanical, and technical demands, yet its effects on antioxidant, nitric oxide-related, and muscle–metabolic biomarkers remain unclear. This study examined the effects of eight weeks of basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) on selected biochemical markers in competitive male basketball players. Methods Twenty-three players were allocated using simple individual randomization to an experimental group (EG; n = 13) or control group (CG; n = 10). Both groups continued broadly comparable routine technical–tactical basketball training, while the EG additionally completed basketball-specific MIIT three times weekly at 65–75% of maximal heart rate. Serum SOD, CAT, MDA, GSH, L-arginine, eNOS, CK, urea, and creatinine were assessed at baseline and 48 h after the final training session. Post-intervention outcomes were analysed using ANCOVA, with group as the fixed factor and baseline values as covariates. Results Baseline-adjusted SOD was significantly higher in the EG (difference = 2.03 U/mL, 95% CI 0.66–3.39; p = .006), whereas MDA was significantly lower (−0.357 nmol/mL, 95% CI −0.701 to −0.012; p = .043). Urea was also significantly higher in the EG (8.31 mg/dL, 95% CI 2.13–14.49; p = .011). CAT, GSH, L-arginine, eNOS, and CK showed no significant baseline-adjusted between-group differences. Creatinine was significantly higher in the EG; however, because the homogeneity-of-regression-slopes assumption was violated for this outcome, the adjusted group difference should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusions Basketball-specific MIIT was associated with marker-specific antioxidant and metabolic responses. Because measurements were limited to baseline and 48 h after the final session, cumulative adaptations cannot be distinguished from residual exercise responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cincioğlu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in competitive male basketball players (n=23). basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) vs. routine technical–tactical basketball training was evaluated on Baseline-adjusted SOD (MD 2.03 U/mL, 95% CI 0.66-3.39, p=.006). Eight weeks of basketball-specific moderate-intensity interval training increased baseline-adjusted SOD and decreased MDA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: