Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Algorithmic study demonstrates improved herb recommendation across clinical datasets, highlighting the value of modeling high-order patient relations.
As the core of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnosis and treatment, herb recommendation aims to recommend a group of herbs according to patients’ symptoms. Existing graph-based methods mainly model pairwise relations and either omit explicit syndrome and state-element knowledge or represent the common induction of multiple patients through independent pairwise edges, thereby failing to model it as a single high-order relation. To address this limitation, we aim to improve herb recommendation by explicitly modeling the high-order patient relations induced by shared syndromes and state-element configurations. We propose a multi-hypergraph convolutional neural network (MHGCN) that represents each patient as a node and constructs a syndrome-induced patient hypergraph and a state-element-induced patient hypergraph. In each hypergraph, one hyperedge connects all patients sharing the same syndrome or exact state-element configuration. Parallel encoders learn from the two hypergraphs, and their representations are fused for multi-label herb prediction using a frequency-weighted binary cross-entropy loss. Across ten runs, MHGCN achieved mean F1-score@5 values of 70.532% on the Treatise on Febrile Diseases dataset and 29.737% on the Dictionary of Traditional Chinese Medicine Prescriptions dataset, respectively. It outperformed all evaluated topic-model, graph-based, and large language model baselines. In paired analyses using matched random seeds, its improvements over L i g h t G C N 𝑀 in Precision@5 and F1-score@10 remained significant under both paired 𝑡 -tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests after Holm correction ( 𝑝 a d j < 0 . 0 5 ). These findings demonstrate that representing each common induction event as a patient hyperedge enables MHGCN to model syndrome- and state-element-induced high-order relations directly and supports its effectiveness for herb recommendation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: